obaewankenope:

clonesrightsactivist:

what i say: i like the prequels

what i mean: the prequels may be flawed in directing, acting, dialogue, etc. which at many points make them seem comically awful as movies, and they may be widely reviled by both casual and die hard audiences, but despite that i enjoyed the overall story told, the characters introduced, and the depth and world building it added to the star wars universe.

what people think i mean: the prequels are a cinematic masterpiece without any flaws and i want you to start hurling insults at me

YEET

ltmte:

misterrockett:

edude-makes-comics:

G1 Transformers becomes a lot more unsettling to watch when you take into consideration that all the animation errors are canon.

What do you MEAN they’re canon?

You know Unicron? That old son of a gun turned out to be a multiuniversal singularity. Meaning: in all the Transformers universes there was only the one Unicron. The one from armada, the one from G1, the one from Prime. Every single one of them, the same guy existing at the same time in multiple continuities. Same thing for the 13 and Primus.

But then, in Energon, Unicron fucking died. Like, he ended up dead, that shit had never happened before. And Unicron passed from being alive and existing in all universes in tandem, to be dead in one of them. The fabric of reality couldn’t take it and started to collapse on itself (the setting in Cybertron) which manifests as all the errors that occur in all the continuities.

If I remember correctly, it’s called The Unicron Singularity

All the animation errors, all the continuity inconsistencies

Starscream had Thundercracker’s paintjob for a few frames? Unicron Singularity

A dead character appears on a crowd shot? Unicron Singularity