stavroginova:

bebeocho:

toastoat:

skeppsbrott:

So this has been stuck in my head ever since I heard it three days ago.

this is the polar opposite of Everybody Knows Shits Fucked

i didn’t know this til i looked up the video on youtube, but this dude is a super cool and accomplished musician! his name is Rushad Eggleston–wikipedia describes him as “an innovative musician who has changed the way the cello is played,“ but according to his personal website he’s a “cello goblin & otherworldly jester currently touring earth” 

finally some relatable content

slartibartfastibast:

shieldfoss:

slartibartfastibast:

shieldfoss:

cromulentenough:

firerozebud:

catchymemes:

Conditional Immortality of Lobsters

wait, how does this work with all those giant prehistoric bugs (scorpions and dragonflies and stuff) that were giant in the time of the dinosaurs or whatever. Is it just that they were species that never needed to molt or is there some other reason why this wasn’t an issue for them?

I don’t think insects molt. I don’t know if Scorpions do.

Limitations of oxygen metabolism are different when amount of oxygen is different.

That makes sense

To answer the original question more fully:

On earth, water tends to have a wider range of possible oxygen concentrations than air (mostly because gas is more immediately turbulent, whereas liquids are waaay less immediately turbulent (but technically both are still fundamentally turbulent, unless of the super variety (but I mean come on))). If that’s indeed a major thing constraining lobster size, there would be places small lobsters can go that old lobsters can’t, so maybe someone could look for evidence of that. The maximum size would then be determined by the accessible environmental maximum of oxygen concentration, which could be crazy high in some places, idano. On land, the species size maximum is generally set by much harder limits related to oxygenation and circulation physics stuff. When submerged, the wateriest subsets of land-biology anatomy lose many of the gravitation/bouyancy-related pressures they’ve had to contend with since first leaving the water (in the evolutionary sense). This is also why human legs swell up shrink [edit: herpderp] for a while when we first inhabit microgravity.

The size distribution of water-animals-that-didn’t-leave-for-a-while-and-then-return-with-fucking-upwards-facing-nostrils-on-their-backs will have a more apparent per-species variance than we’re used to seeing on land. Robert Wadlow was only about me-and-a-half along the longest dimension, and his heart gave out pretty early. So, like, fish and crustaceans and cephalopods and reptiles and stuff, but not mammals. Whales can be big, but they still have a hard in-vivo developmental upper bound on size from the doggo days.

chocolatefitspo:

hellabitcoins:

ilovesmoothjazz1998:

hellabitcoins:

aliwav:

listen you boutta have the thickest smoodie of all time, where is your liquid? your ice? weak ass aesthetics, try again

smh they leave the strawberry tops on… might as well leave the gotdam banana peels on

hellabitcoins

u can eat strawberry tops… & recent studies are showing banana peels are healthy n nutritious for u:…. The turntables

n im sure the outside of a coconut is mad high in fiber but im not bout ta eat woodchips cause of no govermence scienticians

this whole post got me in tears